Measuring University Students’ Satisfaction Level on their Courses Experiences


  • Narjis Unar Institute of Health Medicine - Pakistan
  • Muhammad Arshad Mubarakpur Government Higher Secondary School - Pakistan
  • Tunio Shahnawaz College of Education, Zhengzhou University - China



course experiences, teaching and learning environment, university learning facilities


The objective of this study is to determine how satisfied students are with the course experiences provided by the learning facilities in Pakistani universities. This study looks into the factors of what they think is important for their learning environment, because students are the key stakeholders of the learning and education system.  On the other hand, the missionary objectives of any university is to provide quality education and produce better alumni, because students’ achievements not only contribute to their scholastic development, but also build the reputation of an institution. Therefore, to measure the students’ satisfaction level of their course experiences, a self-structured survey questionnaire was used to collect the required data from students of different departments. A number of 141 master’s level students were identified from a local university. The data illustrated that the students’ satisfaction level in the provision of courses was low on given choices, like motivational characteristics, ICT application, and life-long learning skills; moderately satisfied for development of analytical and reflective thinking skills; and high level of satisfaction on all these elements except choices that have been reported of low importance.


El Ansari, W., & Moseley, L. (2011). You get what you measure: Assessing and reporting student satisfaction with their health and social care educational experience. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 173-178. DOI:

Escrigas, C., & Lobra, J. (2009). Higher education at a time of transformation: New dynamics for social responsibility. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. URL:

Gatfield, T. (2000). A scale for measuring student perceptions of quality: An Australian Asian perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(1), 27-41. DOI:

Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2012). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. Corwin Press. URL:

Huang, S., & Fisher, D. (2011). Associations of the university learning environment with academic engagement and satisfaction among science majors in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(2), 291-307. DOI:

Hursen, C., Ozçınar, Z., Ozdamlı, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2011). The communicative competences of students and teachers in different levels of education in North Cyprus. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 59-66. DOI:

Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2009). Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 15-29. DOI:

Malik, M. E., Danish, R. Q., & Usman, A. (2010). The impact of service quality on students’ satisfaction in higher education institutes of Punjab. Journal of Management Research, 2(2), 1-11. URL:

Marzo-Navarro, M., Pedraja-Iglesias, M., & Rivera-Torres, M. P. (2005). Measuring customer satisfaction in summer courses. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(1), 53-65. DOI:

Mavondo, F. T., Zaman, M., & Abubakar, B. (2000). Student satisfaction with tertiary institution and recommending it to prospective students. In Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC 2000): Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge (pp. 787-792). Griffith University. URL:

McInnis-Bowers, C., Chew, E. B., & Bowers, M. R. (2010). Using reflective thinking to enhance decision skills, cultural sensitivity, and teamwork. Marketing Education Review, 20(1), 17-20. DOI:

Meek, V. L., Teichler, U., & Kearney, M. L. (2009, September). Higher education, research and innovation: Changing dynamics. A report on the UNESCO forum on higher education, research and knowledge. International Centre for Higher Education Research, University of Kassel. URL:

Sarwar, S., & Bhamani, S. (2018). Measuring school support for learning English as a foreign language through SSELL. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 194-210. DOI:

Seel, N. M., & Dijkstra, S. (Eds.). (2004). Curriculum, plans, and processes in instructional design: International perspectives. London: Routledge.

Tennant, M., McMullen, C., & Kaczynski, D. (2009). Teaching, learning and research in higher education: A critical approach. New York: Routledge. URL:

Ullah, M. H., Ajmal, M., & Rahman, F. (2011). Analysis of quality indicators of higher education in Pakistan. Canadian Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 1-5. URL:

Yousaf, M. I. (2005). Relationship of performance of university students with the selected variables of school Age. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Arid Agriculture, Pakistan.




How to Cite

Unar, N., Arshad, M., & Shahnawaz, T. (2021). Measuring University Students’ Satisfaction Level on their Courses Experiences. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 1(1), 51–61.