Discursive Constructions in Macbeth

A Systemic-Functional Contribution to English Language Teaching

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17775611

Abstract

Abstract Views: 730

Literary texts invite close attention to how language constructs meaning and guides interpretation. This study explores the representation of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth in Shakespeare’s Macbeth through the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics, with particular focus on the Attitude subsystem of Appraisal Theory. By analysing selected passages from Acts I and V, the research traces how evaluative language shapes the characters’ portrayal at decisive points in the play. The analysis reveals that Macbeth’s progression from admired warrior to tyrant, and Lady Macbeth’s shift from resolute instigator to guilt-ridden figure, are realised through distinct evaluative choices. These findings highlight the value of literature as a resource for English language teaching, not merely as cultural content but as a site of linguistic meaning-making. Approaching literary discourse in this way supports the integration of literary and linguistic literacy, enabling learners to develop both critical interpretive skills and greater sensitivity to language in use.

Keywords:

Appraisal theory, Discursive construction, English language teaching , Macbeth, Systemic functional linguistics

Author Biography

Saba Ahmed,

She is a Lecturer at the Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan. She completed her Masters of Applied Linguistics from NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.

References

Ali, C., & Tasnim, T. (2025). Blood for the Crown: Analyzing Army Coups and Political Upheavals in Shakespeare’s Selected Plays. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i3.2174

Durante, P. G. C. (2025). Advancing critical literacy through critical literature pedagogy-based principles of literary education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 83(2), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/25.83.196

Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&C Black.

Fincham, K., & Lake, P. (1985). The ecclesiastical policy of King James I. Journal of British Studies, 24(2), 169-207. https://doi.org/10.1086/385831

Halliday, M. A. (1964). The linguistic study of literary texts. In Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists (pp. 302-307). The Hague: De Gruyter.

Halliday, M. A. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. revised by CMIM Matthiessen. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.

Hencher, R. (2014). Profane, steal, or usurp: Kingship, divine right, and regicide in Shakespeare's Macbeth and Richard II. Verso: An Undergraduate Journal of Literary Criticism.

Hudson, B. T. (2023). Macbeth before Shakespeare. Oxford University Press.

Hunaepi, H., Khaeruma, K., Hajiriah, T. L., Wardani, K. S. K., Sukiastini, I. G. A. N. K., Nitiasih, P. K., ... & Sudatha, I. (2024). Critical pedagogy and student learning outcomes: A systematic literature review. Path of Science, 10(5), 3048-3060. http://dx.doi.org/10.22178/pos.104-27

Kevin, A., & Joshua, M. (2023). Shakespeare in the EFL Classroom: A Case Study on the Use of Literary Adaptations. Law Research Journal, 1(1), 88-110.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2003). The language of evaluation (Vol. 2). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910

Novianti, N., Thomas, A., & To, V. (2020). Addressing challenges in the practice of critical literacy in EFL classrooms: A new framework. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i1.25049

Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199115462

Polka, B. (2010). Coriolanus and the Roman World of Contradiction: A Paradoxical World Elsewhere. European Legacy, 15(2), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848771003647923

Rakesh, A. (2024). Shakespeare and the Political: Elizabethan Politics and Asian Exigencies. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Talley, C. L. (2013). Shakespeare's concept of love and marriage as presented in ten selected plays (Doctoral dissertation).

Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge.

Wallace, T. (2023). The witch-finder King: A study of James I of England and his relationship to witchcraft (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Victoria).

Yu, L., & Cai, L. (2025). Contemporary American Literature in Distance Learning: Creating Reading Motivation and Student Engagement. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(2), e609. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.609

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Ahmed, S. (2025). Discursive Constructions in Macbeth: A Systemic-Functional Contribution to English Language Teaching. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 5(4), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17775611

Issue

Section

Discussion Paper

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)