Experimental Investigation of Goal Framing Effect on Motivation Quality among Undergraduates

Authors

  • Maryum Firdous Department of Psychology, Mohammad Ali Jinnah University - Pakistan https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8578-1057
  • Dr. Saima Masoom Ali Department of Psychology, University of Karachi - Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.772

Abstract

Abstract Views: 782

Goal framing of a classroom task is important to give students future orientation. An independent group design experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of goal framing (intrinsic and extrinsic, as delineated in Self Determination Theory) of a reading activity on the motivation quality of university students. One hundred and ninety-three students (Mean age= 20.92, SD= 1.512) from six Psychology classes participated in the study through purposive sampling. Five teachers teaching in the Department of Psychology at Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, Karachi manipulated the conditions in their respective classes. Students received instructions on intrinsic, extrinsic, or no goal framing, read a text, and answered the adapted Situational Motivational Scale. The scale assessed their autonomous and controlled motivation and amotivation. ANOVA results showed no significant differences in autonomous motivation among the three framing conditions, whereas controlled motivation was higher in extrinsic framing than in no framing. Amotivation was higher in intrinsic framing and no framing than in extrinsic framing. This implies that extrinsic framing may help reduce amotivation among students and may not harm their academics in collectivist or developing societies. The findings contrast with those demonstrated in developed and Western contexts pointing towards a need for further exploration.

Keywords:

Goal framing, Intrinsic and extrinsic goals, Motivation quality, Self determination theory, Undergraduate students

References

Adnan, M. A. M., Mohamad, S., Buniamin, S., & Mamat, A. (2014). Self-regulated learning and motivation of Islamic studies and non-islazmic studies stream students. Education Sciences & Psychology, 32(6).

Arshad, M., Farooq, O., & Farooq, M. (2019). The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on entrepreneurial intentions: The moderating role of collectivist orientation. Management Decision, 57(3), 649–668. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2016-0248

Bargmann, C., Thiele, L., & Kauffeld, S. (2022). Motivation matters: Predicting students’ career decidedness and intention to drop out after the first year in higher education. Higher Education, 83(4), 845–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00707-6

Behzadnia, B., Alizadeh, E., Haerens, L., & Aghdasi, M. T. (2022). Changes in students’ goal pursuits and motivational regulations toward healthy behaviors during the pandemic: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 59, 102131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102131

Brdar, I., Rijavec, M., & Miljković, D. (2009). Life goals and well-being: Are extrinsic aspirations always detrimental to well-being?. Psihologijske Teme, 18(2), 317-334. https://hrcak.srce.hr/48216

Claver, F., Martínez-Aranda, L. M., Conejero, M., & Gil-Arias, A. (2020). Motivation, discipline, and academic performance in physical education: A holistic approach from achievement goal and self-determination theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01808

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14

Eniko, M. E., & Stefan, S. (2016). Life Goals, Self-Determination and Perception of Ability in Romanian Undergraduate Students: Profile and Academic Performance. Erdelyi Pszichologiai Szemle= Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 17(1), 71–9fv4.

Guay, F. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulations types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211055355

Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and emotion, 24, 175-213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250

Guillen-Royo, M., & Kasser, T. (2015). Personal goals, socio-economic context and happiness: Studying a diverse sample in Peru. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(2), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9515-6

Haser, Ç., Doğan, O., & Kurt Erhan, G. (2022). Tracing students’ mathematics learning loss during school closures in teachers’ self-reported practices. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 102536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102536

Hope, N. H., Holding, A. C., Verner-Filion, J., Sheldon, K. M., & Koestner, R. (2019). The path from intrinsic aspirations to subjective well-being is mediated by changes in basic psychological need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: A large prospective test. Motivation and Emotion, 43(2), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9733-z

Jeno, L. M., Dettweiler, U., & Grytnes, J.-A. (2020). The effects of a goal-framing and need-supportive app on undergraduates’ intentions, effort, and achievement in mobile science learning. Computers & Education, 159, 104022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104022

Jeno, L. M., Nylehn, J., Hole, T. N., Raaheim, A., Velle, G., & Vandvik, V. (2023). Motivational determinants of students’ academic functioning: The role of autonomy-support, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1990125

Johansen, M. O., Eliassen, S., & Jeno, L. M. (2023). The bright and dark side of autonomy: How autonomy support and thwarting relate to student motivation and academic functioning. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1153647. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1153647

Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the american dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223006

Kim, Y., Kasser, T., & Lee, H. (2003). Self-concept, aspirations, and weil-being in South Korea and the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598445

King, R. B., & Datu, J. A. D. (2017). Materialism does not pay: Materialistic students have lower motivation, engagement, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.03.003

Lu, G., Xie, K., & Liu, Q. (2022). What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: Perception of the learning environment and students’ motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1665–1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13204

Nishimura, T., & Suzuki, T. (2016). Aspirations and life satisfaction in Japan: The big five personality makes clear. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.070

Norhasmi, N. N. F., Rasid, N. S. A., Alias, N. S. M. M., Sohaini, M. S. F. M., Rahman, S. M. S. A., Baharin, N. A., ... & Lourdunathan, P. (2021). The Evaluation of an Online Peer Support Group on the Level of Situational Motivation among University Students Amidst a Pandemic: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. IIUM Journal of Human Sciences, 3(2), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v3i2.202

Romero, E., Gómez–Fraguela, J. A., & Villar, P. (2012). Life aspirations, personality traits and subjective well–being in a Spanish Sample. European Journal of Personality, 26(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.815

Schulz, B. (2008). The importance of soft skills: Education beyond academic knowledge. NAWA Journal of Language & Communication, 2(1).

Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261883

Siwek, Z., Oleszkowicz, A., & Słowińska, A. (2017). Values realized in personal strivings and motivation, and meaning in life in Polish University Students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9737-x

Tjin A Tsoi, S. L. N. M., De Boer, A., Croiset, G., Koster, A. S., Van Der Burgt, S., & Kusurkar, R. A. (2018). How basic psychological needs and motivation affect vitality and lifelong learning adaptability of pharmacists: A structural equation model. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(3), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9812-7

Toth-Bos, A., Wisse, B., & Farago, K. (2020). The interactive effect of goal attainment and goal importance on acculturation and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00704

Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

Van Soom, C., & Donche, V. (2014). Profiling first-year students in STEM programs based on autonomous motivation and academic self-concept and relationship with academic achievement. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e112489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112489

Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy‐supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development, 76(2), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x

Vansteenkiste, M., Timmermans, T., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Van Den Broeck, A. (2008). Does extrinsic goal framing enhance extrinsic goal-oriented individuals’ learning and performance? An experimental test of the match perspective versus self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.387

Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2023). Do learners share the same perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying the role of motivation, perceived learning support, learning engagement, and self-regulated learning strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100880

Wormington, S. V., Corpus, J. H., & Anderson, K. G. (2012). A person-centered investigation of academic motivation and its correlates in high school. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.004

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Firdous, M., & Masoom Ali, S. (2024). Experimental Investigation of Goal Framing Effect on Motivation Quality among Undergraduates. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.772

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.