Impact of Multimodal Digital Media Communication on Generation Z’s Language Use and Literacy Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v3i4.593Abstract
Abstract Views: 1419
The impact of increased use of digital communication mediated through social media was observed during COVID-19, in particular, on students’ language and its use in the classroom and their literacy practices. This led to an investigation of the use of multimodal digital communication in the language of Generation Z users at the focal university. Social-semiotic theory of multimodality in digital communication provided the theoretical framework for the study. A quantitative survey was done with 394 respondents on the frequency of use of different apps for different purposes, as well as students’ perceptions of the impact of social media on their literacy practices. Subsequently, qualitative interviews were done to gain a more in-depth understanding of the survey results. The results of this mixed-methods study indicate that Generation Z users are well aware of the affordances and constraints of different social media platforms and apps and use this knowledge judiciously for varied purposes and audiences in their digital communication. This has also impacted their crafting and interpreting of digital multimodal messages. The study findings have implications for teaching English (and other languages); similarly, other disciplines also need to take into account students’ changing literacy practices to enhance their learning outcomes.
Keywords:
Digital communication, Generation Z, Literacy practices, Multimodal communication, Social media appsReferences
Baron, N. S. (2009). Are digital media changing language?. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 42-46.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.2307/326568
Chakrabarty, D. (2020). Theories of the new literacy studies (NLS). Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 8(1), 1-8.
Constantinou, O. (2005). Multimodal discourse analysis: Media, modes and technologies. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(4), 602.
Gee, J.P. (2015). The New Literacy Studies. The Routledge Handbook of literacy studies (pp.35-48). Routledge.
Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5(2), 110-123.
Jovanovic, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Multimodal dialogue on social media. Social Semiotics, 28(5), 683-699. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504732
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kress, G. (2012). Multimodal discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 35-50). Routledge.
Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
LeVine, P., & Scollon, R. (2004). Discourse and technology. Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Georgetown.
Lyons, A. (2018). Multimodal expression in written digital discourse: The case of kineticons. Journal of Pragmatics, 131, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.001
Sakr, M., Jewitt, C., & Price, S. (2016). Mobile experiences of historical place: A multimodal analysis of emotional engagement. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(1), 51-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1115761
Street, B. (1997). The implications of the ‘new literacy studies’ for literacy education. English in Education, 31(3), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1997.tb00133.x
Street, B. V. (2017). New literacy studies in educational contexts. In Teacher and librarian partnerships in literacy education in the 21st century (pp. 23-32). Brill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

















