Exploring English Language Learning Needs of Pakistani ESL Postgraduate Research Students
A Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v3i3.548Abstract
Abstract Views: 1025
English has gained supremacy as the primary language in a range of domains including business, science, technology, higher education, and research. This dominance has created a necessity for a curriculum that meets learners' needs. In Pakistan, postgraduate students face challenges related to the English language in coursework, research paper writing, and dissertation preparation. The objective of this research was to examine the English language requirements of potential Pakistani postgraduate students, who were pursuing studies in science disciplines. The sample included 26 prospective MS students and 4 prospective PhD students, who were preparing for admission tests. The researchers used a semi-structured questionnaire to collect the data, which had been validated by two experts. Thematic analysis revealed that the prospective postgraduate students needed reading skills for reading and comprehending research papers, followed by writing skills for research proposal writing and thesis writing. Participants also recognized the importance of speaking skills for research presentations and communication with supervisors, and listening skills for better understanding of lectures and seminars. The findings suggest that ESP learner-cantered courses should be offered to Pakistani MS/MPhil and PhD candidates that focus on the four language skills for research purposes.
Keywords:
ESL, ESP, Need analysis, Pakistan universities, Postgraduate levelReferences
Ahsan, H. M., Gohar, S., & Bilal, H. A. (2012). Pupil abilities and their needs analysis in view of Pakistani settings. Academic Research International, 2(3), 675.
Aliakbari, M., & Boghayeri, M. (2014). A needs analysis approach to ESP design in Iranian context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.404
Azam, R., & Asim, M. (2023). Application of English Textbook for Teaching of Integrated Language Skills Through Classroom Activities: A Survey on English Teachers. Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 3(2), 50-68.
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Belcher, D. (2013). The future of ESP research: resources for access and choice. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 535-551).Wiley- Blackwell
Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL quarterly, 40(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264514
Belcher, D., Johns, A. M., & Paltridge, B. (Eds.). (2011). New directions in English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Benavent, G. T., & Sánchez-Reyes, S. (2015). Target situation as a key element for ESP (Law Enforcement) syllabus design. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.044
Bibi, A. Bukhari, N. H. (2020). Extensive reading: a study of its effects on graduate level students' l2 vocabulary. Pakistan Journal of Languages and Translation Studies, 2020 (1), 44-60.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Carver, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. The ESP journal, 2(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-2380(93)90003-P
Channa, M. A., Soranastaporn, S., Engchuan, K. S., & Tirataradol, Y. (2013). A study of needs, problems and wants of using English of Engineering students at Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering. Science and Technology, Pakistan. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(3), 18-26.
Cowling, J. D. (2007). Needs analysis: Planning a syllabus for a series of intensive workplace courses at a leading Japanese company. English for Specific Purposes, 26(4), 426-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.003
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005
Fareed, M., Jamal, U. B., & Zai, R. A. Y. (2021). Peer feedback on writing skills: perceptions of Pakistani ESL postgraduate students. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.52337/pjer.v4i1.169
Fareed, M., Khan, I., & Akhtar, H. (2021). The causes of English writing anxiety among Pakistani ESL students: Perceptions of teachers and students. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2021.0901.0109
Flick, U. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative data collection. Sage Publications Ltd.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
Humphreys, P. (2022). The need for English language development in Anglophone higher education settings: A case study from Australia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 59, 101156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101156
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1998). Dimensions of dialogue: Large classes in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(8), 739-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00061-5
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kameda, N. (2001). The implication of language style in business communication: focus on English versus Japanese. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(3), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005738
Khalid, A. (2016). Nursing English in Pakistan: Instructors’ perceptions of language curriculum. Journal of NELTA, 21(1-2), 1-10.
Liyanage, I., & Birch, G. (2001). English for general academic purposes: Catering to discipline-specific needs. Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 48-67.
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task‐based syllabus design. TESOL quarterly, 26(1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587368
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
Mo, H. (2005). A brief review of English for academic purposes (EAP). US-China foreign language, 3(7), 62-67.
Munby, J. (1978). Communication syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
Nunan, D. (1988). The leaner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2016). English for specific purposes. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 56-67). Routledge.
Rao, V. C. S. (2018). The use of English language in research. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 1-8.
Robinson, P. C. (1991). ESP Today: A Practitioners Guide. Hemel Hempstead: Phonix Rao. 2007. The Role of the English Language in the Tourism Industry. Jurnal Online). International Journal of English Literature and Culture.
Sabariah, M. R., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2005). Designing test specifications for assessing ESL writing skills in English for academic purposes. ELT Concerns in Assessment, 149-167.
Sager, J. C. (1994). Language engineering and translation: Consequences of automation (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing.
Siddiqua, N., Asim, M., & Bibi, A. (2014). The Effects of Experiential Learning Style at Higher Education Level: Teachers’ Perspective. Journal of History and Social Sciences, 5(1).
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students (pp. 155-6). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Zhu, W., & Flaitz, J. (2005). Using focus group methodology to understand international students' academic language needs: A comparison of perspectives. Tesl-Ej, 8(4), n4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
