Exploring Science and Maths Teachers’ Perceptions of STEM Education in Hunza, Gilgit-Baltistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17768233Abstract
Abstract Views: 1206
This qualitative case study explores the perceptions of secondary school science and mathematics teachers regarding STEM education in the context of Hunza. Data was collected from 10 teachers via a multi-method approach, including semi-structured interviews, personal meaning mapping, photo elicitation, and document analysis of lesson plans. Thematic analysis of the data revealed three overarching themes. First, teachers hold multiple, nuanced definitions of STEM education, primarily conceptualising it as integrated learning, technology-based instruction, a student-centred pedagogical approach, and, in one instance, specifically as robotics. Second, teachers perceived significant multifaceted benefits for students, including heightened motivation and active engagement, the development of robust problem-solving and critical thinking skills, early awareness of STEM career pathways, and a marked increase in student confidence. Third, teachers faced substantial systemic and operational challenges in implementation, such as profound difficulties in forming integrated STEM instruction due to a lack of cross-disciplinary content knowledge, lack of specialised in-service training, overwhelming time constraints within a rigid curriculum, and a pervasive lack of administrative and resource support. The study finds a significant gap between acknowledging STEM's importance and effectively implementing it. Thus, it recommends a comprehensive strategy that includes creating a clear, localised definition of STEM through collaboration, providing ongoing teacher training, reforming the curriculum for flexibility, and increasing administrative support and funding.
Keywords:
Integrated learning, Professional development, STEM education, Teachers' perceptions of STEM, Teaching approachReferences
Al Murshidi, G. (2019). Stem education in the United Arab Emirates: Challenges and possibilities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(12), 316-332. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.18
Altan, E. B., & Ercan, S. (2016). STEM education program for science teachers: perceptions and competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(special), 103-117. https://hdl.handle.net/11486/4195
Aslam, S., Saleem, A., Kennedy, T. J., Kumar, T., Parveen, K., Akram, H., & Zhang, B. (2022). Identifying the research and trends in STEM education in Pakistan: A systematic literature review. Sage Open, 12(3), 21582440221118545. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221118545
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0065-4
Cohen, C., Patterson, D. G., Kovarik, D. N., & Chowning, J. T. (2013). Fostering STEM career awareness: emerging opportunities for teachers. Washington State Kappan, 6(2), 12-17.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
El-Deghaidy, H., & Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of STEM education: Possibilities and challenges. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.1.1.51-54
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage Publications.
Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson. One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Hali, A. U., Aslam, S., Zhang, B., & Saleem, A. (2021). An overview on STEM education in Pakistan: Situation and challenges. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2021.20
Hallinen, J. (2024, September 30). STEM. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/STEMeducation
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
Hasanah, U. (2020). Key definitions of STEM education: Literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3), e2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Lelliott, A. D. (2009). Using personal meaning mapping to gather data on school visits. Vision Research, 43, 333-346.
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
McDonald, C. (2016). STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530-569.
Mok, I. A. C., & Ren, Z. (2021). The contextual and personal aspects of the development of a school-based STEM curriculum: A case in Hong Kong. In STEM Education from Asia (pp. 114-126). Routledge.
Mustam, A. A., & Adnan, M. (2019, June). Perception of primary mathematics teachers on STEM-oriented teaching and learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1227, No. 1, p. 012009). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012009
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11463
Pannucci, C. J., & Wilkins, E. G. (2010). Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 126(2), 619-625. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc
Perales, F. J., & Aróstegui, J. L. (2024). The STEAM approach: Implementation and educational, social and economic consequences. Arts Education Policy Review, 125(2), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1974997
Ponelis, S. R. (2015). Using interpretive qualitative case studies for exploratory research in doctoral studies: A case of information systems research in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 535.
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5
Samara, V., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Primary school teachers’ perceptions of using STEM in the classroom attitudes, obstacles, and suggestions: A literature review. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), ep23018. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/13298
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International journal of STEM education, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
Siekmann, G. (2016). What Is STEM? The Need for Unpacking Its Definitions and Applications. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
Srikoom, W., & Faikhamta, C. (2018). Assessing in-service teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs about STEM education. Journal of Education, 12(4), 169-186.
Starman, A. B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies/Sodobna Pedagogika, 64(1).
Torre, D., & Murphy, J. (2015). A different lens: Changing perspectives using photo-elicitation interviews. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 111-111. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2051
Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636
Washington, W. M., Natalicio, D. S., Arvizu, D. E., Barish, B. C., Beering, S. C., Bowen, R. M., ... & Staff, N. S. (2006). National Science Board. Report of the NSB.
Winarni, E. W., & Rahman, A. (2025). Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills of Biology Students Through the Development of STEM-Based Invertebrate Zoology Teaching Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(9), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i9.11637
Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004-2021): towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-08-2022-0090
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

















