Examining the Outcomes and Challenges of the B.Ed. Program in Developing Prospective Teachers' Teaching Skills for the 21st Century

A Theoretical and Practical Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14999140

Abstract

Abstract Views: 675

This study examines the outcomes and challenges of the B.Ed. (4 years) program in developing prospective teachers' teaching skills for the 21st century. The researchers used purposive sampling techniques and selected 18 male and female university students from Makran, Balochistan, enrolled in the 8th semester. The qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings revealed that the theoretical aspect of the B.Ed. 4-year program plays a vital role in equipping future teachers with the necessary knowledge and skills to become effective teachers of the 21st century. However, the practical aspect of the program, such as the practicum, revealed a lack of ICT learning strategies to enhance the students' and teachers' technological competencies to understand teaching in the digital era. Moreover, the study suggested that a B.Ed. 4-year program is the essential requirement for the appointment of teachers in the teaching field, and the program should be updated with modern ICT. There should be a proper continuous professional development program for the instructors to train B.Ed. Students as an effective teacher of the 21st century.

Keywords:

21st century, B. Ed 4-year program, Challenges & outcomes, Practical perspective, Teachers' teaching skills

Author Biographies

Manzoor Ahmed,

He is a Lecturer at the Department of Education, University of Turbat in Turbat – Pakistan. He received his M.Phil. in Education from Iqra University in Karachi – Pakistan.  

Razia Fakir Mohammad (Ph.D),

She is a Professor at the Department of Education, Iqra University in Karachi – Pakistan. She obtained her Doctorate in Mathematics Teacher Education from Oxford University in Oxford – United Kingdom.

References

Aabla, B. I. Q. I. C. H. E. (2017). A review on 21st century learning models. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 6(1), 254-263.

Abbas, H. S. M., Xu, X., & Sun, C. (2022). The role of state capacity and socio-economic determinants on health quality and its access in Pakistan (1990–2019). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 83, 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101109

Ahmad, I., & Hussain, M. A. (2014). National education policy (NEP 2009-2015) in Pakistan: Critical analysis and a way forward. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 53(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.46568/jssh.v53i2.169

Chapman, J. D., & Aspin, D. N. (2013). A problem-solving approach to addressing current global challenges in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2012.756166

Choy, S. C., Dinham, J., Yim, J. S. C., & Williams, P. (2021). Reflective thinking practices among pre-service teachers: Comparison between Malaysia and Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 46(2), 1-15.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399

Downes, E. R. (2012, August). Trust, Engagement, and Technology Transfer: Underpinnings for US-Brazil Defense Cooperation. In Strategic Forum (No. 279, p. 1). National Defense University Press.

Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141

Halder, I. (2023). Innovation pedagogy of 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5, 1-6.

Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201-233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323

Iqbal, M., Razi, S. K. A., & Cheema, I. U. (2022). Implementation of the B.Ed. (Hons) Program curriculum at post graduate levels: Problems and Prospects. Harf-o-Sukhan, 6(2), 113-124.

Iqbal, Z., & Naureen, S. (2019). A study to explore the link between demonstration teaching method in physics and student’s learning achievement at secondary level in Quetta District. Journal of Education And Humanities Research (JEHR), University of Balochistan, Quetta, 8(II).

Irfan, M., Hameed, S. A., Sarwar, U. B., Abas, N., & Saleem, M. S. (2019). SWOT analysis of energy policy 2013 of Pakistan. European Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.33422/ejest.2019.01.53

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Majoka, M. I., & Khan, M. I. (2017). Education policy provisions and objectives. A review of Pakistani education policies. Italian Journal of sociology of education, 9(Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 9/2), 104-125. https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2017-2-6

Mâţă, L., & Suciu, A. I. (2011). Curricular innovative model focused on developing pedagogical competences of teachers of Language and communication. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.036

Mundy, K., & Murphy, L. (2001). Beyond the nation-state: Educational contention in global civil society. Education Between States, Markets, and Civil Society: Comparative Perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Mynbayeva, A., Sadvakassova, Z., & Akshalova, B. (2018). Pedagogy of the twenty-first century: Innovative teaching methods. New pedagogical challenges in the 21st century. Contributions of Research in Education, 7, 564-578. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72341

Nosheen, S. S., Akram, M., & Javed, M. (2019). Problems of University Students in Speaking English during Classroom Participation. International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning (IJITL), 5(2), 64-78.

Qazi, W., Rawat, K. J., & Thomas, M. (2012). The role of practicum in enhancing student teachers’ teaching skills. American Journal of Scientific Research, 44(12), 44-57.

Sarwar, B., Zulfiqar, S., Aziz, S., & Ejaz Chandia, K. (2019). Usage of social media tools for collaborative learning: The effect on learning success with the moderating role of cyberbullying. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 246-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117748415

Siddique, M., Siddique, A., & Khan, E. A. (2023). Academic optimism and teachers’ commitment: an associational study of Pakistani teachers. Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences Review (JERSSR), 3(1), 178-188.

Siemens, G. (2004). Elearnspace. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Elearnspace. org, 14-16.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. ASTD Learning News, 10(1), 1-28.

Trique, M., & Kumar, A. (2022). Proposed four years integrated B. Ed. Program: Attitude and perceptions of teacher educators. Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 7129-7129.

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Ahmed, M., & Mohammad, R. F. (2025). Examining the Outcomes and Challenges of the B.Ed. Program in Developing Prospective Teachers’ Teaching Skills for the 21st Century: A Theoretical and Practical Perspective . Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 5(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14999140

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.