The ‘Loose Use’ of Figurative Language in Pakistani TEDx Talks

A Perspective of Relevance Theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48112/tibss.v1i4.663

Abstract

Abstract Views: 477

The current study utilised a qualitative approach to implement thematic analysis of the ‘loose use’ of figurative language in TEDx Talks, focusing on irony, hyperbole, and metaphor, within the framework of Relevance Theory by Wilson and Sperber, which states that the successful interpretation of figurative language depends on its own optimal relevance to the context. Two speeches from TEDx Pakistan, delivered in English, serve as the data sources. This qualitative study attempts to identify whether figurative utterances used in public speaking facilitate an appropriate interpretation of ideas. The study found that metaphor, hyperbole, and irony enhance communication without complicating interpretation. Metaphors connect details to the main message, hyperboles convey emotions vividly, and irony, when used appropriately, maintains meaningful communication. Also, strong implicatures are communicated instantly based on context and speaker attitude. This research suggests that mindful use of figurative language can empower public speakers to connect with audiences more deeply, paving the way for more impactful and memorable communication. There is a wide scope for future research in the public discourse of Pakistani English.

Keywords:

Figurative language, Loose use, Pakistani English, Relevance theory, TEDx Talks

References

Afzal, S. and Hassan, A. (2021). Using rhetorical and persuasive techniques: a political discourse analysis of the victory speech by Imran Khan. Journal of Communication and Cultural Trends, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.32350/jcct.32.05

Al-Jarrah, R. S., Abu-Dalu, A. M., & Obiedat, H. (2018). Translation of strategic ambiguity: A relevance-theoretic analysis. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 54(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2018-0001

Arana, V., Blázquez, B., Espinosa, G., & Valls, L. (2013). Analysing prosody and meaning in Spanish: implications for the teaching of English as a foreign language. Revista Leitura, 2(52), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.28998/2317-9945.2013v2n52p207-226

Crible, L., Abuczki, Á., Burkšaitienė, N., Furkó, P., Nedoluzhko, A., Rackevičienė, S., ... & Zikánová, Š. (2019). Functions and translations of discourse markers in TED Talks: A parallel corpus study of underspecification in five languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.012

Giora, R. (1997). Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00065-8

Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press: Cambridge MA.

Liamis, A. (2020). Visualizing TEDx Events: Ten Years of “Ideas Worth Spreading”. The Graduate Center, City University of New York.

Ludewig, J. (2017). TED Talks as an emergent genre. Clcweb-Comparative Literature and Culture, 19(1).

Mattiello, E. (2017). The popularisation of science via TED talks. International Journal of Language Studies, 11.

Needham-Didsbury, I. (2014). Metaphor in psychotherapeutic discourse: Implications for utterance interpretation. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2014-0005

Pinar, W. F. (Ed.). (2013). International handbook of curriculum research. Routledge.

Schourup, L. (2011). The discourse marker now: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(8), 2110-2129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.005

Sperber, D. (1994). Understanding verbal understanding. What is Intelligence, 179, 98.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (Vol. 142). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wang, X., & Chen, R. (2021). An Analysis of Figures of Speech from the Perspective of Relevance Theory-Case Study of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Interpretation, 3(20), 14-25.

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2002). Truthfulness and relevance. Mind, 111(443), 583-632. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/111.443.583

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. The handbook of pragmatics. Edited by L. Horn, G. Ward. Oxford, Blackwell, 607-632.

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2006). Relevance theory. The Handbook of Pragmatics, 606-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Munir, T., Sultan, S. R., & Kunwar, I. (2023). The ‘Loose Use’ of Figurative Language in Pakistani TEDx Talks: A Perspective of Relevance Theory. International Journal of Trends and Innovations in Business & Social Sciences, 1(4), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.48112/tibss.v1i4.663

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.