The Dynamics of Politeness and Face-Threatening in Pakistani TV Entertainment Talk Shows
Analyzing Host-Guest Interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15251844Abstract
Abstract Views: 444
This study examined the pragmatic role of politeness in Pakistani TV entertainment shows, focusing on the strategies employed by the host and guests to navigate face-saving and face-threatening acts. To this end, six episodes from three distinct seasons of the Pakistani TV entertainment show ‘Mazaaq Raat’ were carefully selected, ensuring an inclusive representation of different hosts and guests. A descriptive and analytical research methodology was employed to examine the data taken from the show. The results established on the classification of politeness theory specified that all four strategies were used in interaction among the participants of the show for face-saving and face-threatening. Focusing on three different hosts, the study unfolded how politeness strategies, varied depending on the guest and context. The analysis also revealed that while the hosts of the first two seasons used a similar approach, the host of the third season adopted a more enthusiastic and interactive style, emphasizing positive politeness, especially with guests from the showbiz industry. Subsequently, it was concluded that both face-saving and face-threatening approaches were being engaged in the Pakistani TV entertainment show ‘Mazaaq Raat’ however, their use was arbitrary except for the use of positive strategy in the opening of the show by the host.
Keywords:
Dynamics of face-threatening, Dynamics of politeness, Entertainment talk shows, Host-guest interactions, Pakistani TVReferences
Allott, N. (2010). Key terms in pragmatics. A&C Black.
Bartłomiejczyk, M. (2020). Parliamentary impoliteness and the interpreter’s gender. Pragmatics, 30(4), 459-484. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18064.bar
Blitvich, P. G. C., & Sifianou, M. (2019). Im/politeness and discursive pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge university press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press.
Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (2017). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Routledge.
Jones, R. H. (2015). Creativity and discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 61-77). Routledge.
King, J. C. (2014). Speaker intentions in context. Noûs, 48(2), 219-237. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43828870
Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
Pishghadam, R., & Navari, S. (2012). A study into politeness strategies and politeness markers in advertisements as persuasive tools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 161-171.
Rahastri, C. Y. (2017). Politeness strategies used by Ellen Degeneres and US politician in the Ellen Show. Yogyakarta: English Language Education Study Program, Sanata Dharma University.
Sadia, S., Asgher, M., & Asgher, T. A. (2020). A pragmatic analysis of politeness strategies used by Pakistani and American politicians in interviews. Ilkogretim Online-Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 3774-3783.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Zaheer, L. (2018). Public Affinity for Political Discourse in Pakistan. Journal of Political Studies, 25(01), 229-241.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bulletin of Multidisciplinary Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
