Risk Perception of Tourist on the Competitiveness of Tourist Destination in Pattaya, Thailand

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48112/iijbs.v2i1.103

Abstract

Abstract Views: 53

With globalization, tourism became a sustainable profitable industry.  This study addresses tourist destination’s competitiveness by determining its strength and assessing its weaknesses to attract tourist notwithstanding the threats and opportunities that they also are bestowed.  This study is anchored on the Cluster Theory of Michael Porter (1990) that states that to be competitive, firms must continually improve operational effectiveness in their activities while simultaneously pursuing distinctive rather than imitative strategic positions. With the use of mixed research design, wherein, both descriptive quantitative correlational research design was used to determine the relationship between competitiveness and tourist destination appeal and risk of the tourist destination as perceived by the tourist, and the use of qualitative questions to draw significant attributes of Tourism competitiveness by interviewing destination managers as informants, the study revealed the characteristics and the average degree of competitiveness of Pattaya Tourists’ Destinations that tourist perceived them vis-à-vis the low risk that the destination posed upon them.  Furthermore, there is no significant relationship between the perceived factors affecting the competitiveness, and risks variables of Pattaya, Thailand as a tourist destination.  There is no significant relationship between local and foreign tourist’s perceptions.  The study proposed an Enhanced Tourism Development Plan in Pattaya, Thailand.

Keywords:

Tourist, Destination, Travel and Tours

References

APEC International Centre for Sustainable Tourism Report 2006

Buhalis, D. (2000) Marketing the Competitive Destination of the Future. Tourism Management, 21, 97-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00095-3

Cui, Fangnan & Liu, Yaolong & Chang, Yuanyuan & Duan, Jin & Li, Jizu. (2016). An overview of tourism risk perception. Natural Hazards. 82. 10.1007/s11069-016-2208-1.

Dwyer, Larry, Zelko Livaic and Robert Mellor (2003a), “Competitiveness Australia as a Tourist Destination,” Journal of Hospitality and Tourist Management, 10(1), 60-78.

Faos-Sola, Eduardo, Alvarez, Maria and Cooper Chris (2014). Tourism as an Instrument for Development: A Theoretical and Practical Study. Volume 5. Emerald Gold Publishing Limited.

Hassan, S. (2000). Determinants of Market Competitiveness in an Environmentally Sustainable Tourism Industry. Journal of Travel Research,38 (February), 239-245.

Liu, A. and Pratt, S., (2017). Tourism's vulnerability and resilience to terrorism, Tourism Management, Volume 60, 2017, Pages 404-417, ISSN 0261-5177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.01.001.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517717300018)

Manat Chaisawat (2005) Travel and Tourism Education in Thailand, Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 5:3, 197-224, DOI: 10.1300/J172v05n03_02

Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2017) in the ASEAN Business Dialogue

Porter Michael (1990). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Publishing. Copright @2021 Harvard Business School Publishing

UNWTO Tourism Highlights 2017

Vengesayi, Sebastian. (2003). A conceptual model of tourism destination competitiveness and attractiveness.

World Tourism Organization, (2003b)

World Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index 2015 Ranking

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Imbong, M. F., & Kallayanapan, Y. (2021). Risk Perception of Tourist on the Competitiveness of Tourist Destination in Pattaya, Thailand. IRAPA International Journal of Business Studies, 2(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.48112/iijbs.v2i1.103

Issue

Section

Articles